Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinod Kumar Giri Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vinod Kumar Giri Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) CBDT Limits overlooked -Pecuniary jurisdiction of AC/DC ignored – ITAT Kolkata strikes down ITO’s 148 Notice Assessee filed return declaring Rs 30,88,650. AO, based on DDIT(Inv) information, initiated proceedings u/s 148A & in the absence of reply, issued notice u/s 148. AO made addition of Rs 92,95,020 as unexplained credit u/s 68. CIT(A) dismissed appeal ex parte. Assessee challenged order by taking legal ground that ITO, Ward-47(1), Kolkata had no pecuniary jurisdiction to issue notice u/s 148 since, as per CBDT Instruction 1/2011 & Notific...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031