Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ratansinh Solanki Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ratansinh Solanki Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside additions made under Section 69A; Directs fresh adjudication after admitting additional evidence under Rule 46A Assessee  engaged in a small-scale milk & buttermilk business, appealed against the additions made by AO u/s 69A & 115BBE. The case was triggered by cash deposits of Rs. 56.33 lakhs & Rs. 1.63 crores in two bank accounts, with no return of income filed initially.  Based on cash deposits reported via the NMS/INSIGHT portal, reassessment was initiated u/s147. AO treated cash deposits as unexplained money ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930