Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vidjayane Durairaj –Vidjayane Velradjou Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vidjayane Durairaj –Vidjayane Velradjou Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) In the case abovementioned ITAT have held that there is no need to purchase residential property in own name by any assesseee for the purpose of claim of capital gain u/s 54F. Assessee didnot file return for AY 2012-13. AO received information that assessee had deposited cash into his account to the tune of Rs.19,75,000/-. Case was re-opened and in response to notice  u/s 148, assessee filed his return at Rs.2,92,100/-. AO observed that assessee has sold an immovable property for consideration of Rs.50,40,000/- which was received...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930