Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kamaluddin Popatlal Surani Vs PCIT (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kamaluddin Popatlal Surani Vs PCIT (ITAT Surat)

In the matter abovementioned ITAT Surat have held that PCIT rightly invoked jurisdiction u/s 263 as he observed that assessee failed to explain the nature and source of investment with necessary supporting evidence.

Assessee carried on retail business of onion and potatoes who filed his return for AY 2017-18 at Rs.3,45,749/-. The case was re-opened for the reason that assessee had purchased immovable properties for Rs.33,18,000/- whose value was Rs.48,11,989/- as per the Stamp Valuation Authority (SVA). After noticing the diffe

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31