Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kamaluddin Popatlal Surani Vs PCIT (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kamaluddin Popatlal Surani Vs PCIT (ITAT Surat) In the matter abovementioned ITAT Surat have held that PCIT rightly invoked jurisdiction u/s 263 as he observed that assessee failed to explain the nature and source of investment with necessary supporting evidence. Assessee carried on retail business of onion and potatoes who filed his return for AY 2017-18 at Rs.3,45,749/-. The case was re-opened for the reason that assessee had purchased immovable properties for Rs.33,18,000/- whose value was Rs.48,11,989/- as per the Stamp Valuation Authority (SVA). After noticing the difference of Rs.14,93,9...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930