Case Law Details
Case Name : Kamaluddin Popatlal Surani Vs PCIT (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Surat
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Kamaluddin Popatlal Surani Vs PCIT (ITAT Surat)
In the matter abovementioned ITAT Surat have held that PCIT rightly invoked jurisdiction u/s 263 as he observed that assessee failed to explain the nature and source of investment with necessary supporting evidence.
Assessee carried on retail business of onion and potatoes who filed his return for AY 2017-18 at Rs.3,45,749/-. The case was re-opened for the reason that assessee had purchased immovable properties for Rs.33,18,000/- whose value was Rs.48,11,989/- as per the Stamp Valuation Authority (SVA). After noticing the diffe
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.