Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vidjayane Durairaj –Vidjayane Velradjou Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Vidjayane Durairaj –Vidjayane Velradjou Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

In the case abovementioned ITAT have held that there is no need to purchase residential property in own name by any assesseee for the purpose of claim of capital gain u/s 54F.

Assessee didnot file return for AY 2012-13. AO received information that assessee had deposited cash into his account to the tune of Rs.19,75,000/-. Case was re-opened and in response to notice  u/s 148, assessee filed his return at Rs.2,92,100/-. AO observed that assessee has sold an immovable property for consideration of Rs.50,40,000/-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031