Case Law Details
Case Name : Vidjayane Durairaj –Vidjayane Velradjou Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Vidjayane Durairaj –Vidjayane Velradjou Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
In the case abovementioned ITAT have held that there is no need to purchase residential property in own name by any assesseee for the purpose of claim of capital gain u/s 54F.
Assessee didnot file return for AY 2012-13. AO received information that assessee had deposited cash into his account to the tune of Rs.19,75,000/-. Case was re-opened and in response to notice u/s 148, assessee filed his return at Rs.2,92,100/-. AO observed that assessee has sold an immovable property for consideration of Rs.50,40,000/-
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.