Case Law Details
Gauri Construction Company Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Introduction: Gauri Construction Company faced a dispute with the Income Tax Department concerning deductions for routine establishment expenses and interest on loans. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Mumbai recently ruled on this matter, overturning the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)].
Detailed Analysis: The crux of the issue lay in the disallowance of expenses totaling Rs. 2.35 crores by the Assessing Officer (AO), which the CIT(A) upheld. These expenses included construction, establishment, and interest expenses. The AO argued that since the construction of Tower D1 was completed earlier, the expenses were not relevant to the project. However, Gauri Construction contended that these expenses were indeed related to Tower D1 and submitted evidence to support this claim.
The ITAT acknowledged Gauri Construction’s reasoning, stating that even after completing the construction, a builder incurs expenses for common areas and pending works, which are essential for the project’s completion. Therefore, it deemed the disallowance unjustified and instructed the AO to reconsider the matter, taking into account the additional evidence provided.
Regarding establishment and interest expenses, the ITAT recognized Gauri Construction’s ongoing business activities and reasoned that such expenses should be allowed irrespective of their direct relation to Tower D1. It directed the AO to reexamine these expenses with a fresh perspective, considering the company’s explanation.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
