Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

Section 143(3)(d) of Companies Act, 2013 states that ‘the auditors report shall state whether, the company’s balance sheet and profit and loss account dealt with in the report are in agreement with the books of account and returns’.

It is apparent from the financial statements for the financial year ended 31.03.2021 Interest Accrued” on Secured Long-term borrowing has not been shown in the Balance sheet for the year ending 31.03.2021. Thereby affecting the true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company in the financial year 2020-21 leading to violation of Section 129 read with Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013.

It is also noticed that the auditor of the Company has not commented the same in his audit reports, thereby leading to violation of Section 143 read with Section 129 read with Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013. Hence, it appears that the provisions of Section 143(3)(d) of the Companies Act, 2013 has been contravened by the auditor for the financial year 31.03.2021 and therefore he is liable for penalty u/s 450 of the Companies Act, 2013, for the financial year 31.03.2021.

On the date of hearing. Shri Sourabh Krishna, Company Secretary appeared on behalf of Shri Sanjay Jaiswal, however, no submission has been made regarding non­compliance. Hence, it is concluded that the provisions of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 has been contravened by the auditor and therefore he is liable for penalty u/s. 450 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the Financial Year 31.03.2021.

Accordingly MCA imposes Penalty of Rs. 5000 for Non- reporting of violations in audit report on Shri  Sanjay Jaiswal, Chartered Accountants.

Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Office of the Registrar of Companies, Bihar-Cum-Official Liquidator, High Court, Patna
4th Floor, ‘A’ Wing, Maurya Lok Complex
Dakbunglow Road, Patna-800001

Order No. ROC/ PAT/SCN/143/14086/2948 Dated: 29.03.2023

Order for penalty for violation of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013
In the matter of TILAK PROFICIENT NIDHI LIMITED
CIN: U65110BR2008PLC014086

Appointment of Adjudication Officer:-

1. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide its Gazette Notification No. A-42011/112/2014-Ad. II dated 24.03.2015 has appointed the undersigned as Adjudicating Officer in exercise of the powers conferred under section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 (herein after known as Act) read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 for adjudging penalties under the provisions of this Act.

Company:-

2. Whereas, Company M/s. Tilak Proficient Nidhi Limited, CIN: U65110BR2008PLC014086 (herein after known as Company) is a company incorporated on 02.12.2008 under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956/2013 in the state of Bihar and having its registered office situated at Proficient Complex, Patel Chowk< Gaushala Road, Khagaria Bihar 851204, India as per MCA website.

3. As per documents available on MCA Portal, Shri Sanjay Jaiswal is the auditor of the company for the financial year 31.03.2021.

Facts about the case:-

4. the provisions of section 143(3)(d) states that “the auditors report shall state whether, the company’s balance sheet and profit and loss account dealt with in the report are in agreement with the books of account and returns”.

5. AND WHEREAS it is apparent from the financial statements for the financial year ended 31.03.2021 Interest Accrued” on Secured Long-term borrowing has not been shown in the Balance sheet for the year ending 31.03.2021. Thereby affecting the true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company in the financial year 2020-21 leading to violation of Section 129 read with Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013.

6. It is also noticed that the auditor of the Company has not commented the same in his audit reports, thereby leading to violation of Section 143 read with Section 129 read with Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013. Hence, it appears that the provisions of Section 143(3)(d) of the Companies Act, 2013 has been contravened by the auditor for the financial year 31.03.2021 and therefore he is liable for penalty u/s 450 of the Companies Act, 2013, for the financial year 31.03.2021.

7. Whereas, this office has issued show cause notice for default under section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 vide this office letter no. ROC/ PAT/ Inspn/14086/ 2358 dated 02.01.2023. However, this office has not received any reply from the auditor.

8. Whereas, this office had issued “Notice for Hearing” vide No. ROC/PAT/ fnspn/14086/ 2671 dated 16.022023 to the auditor in default to appear personally or through authorizsed representative under Rule 3(3), Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 on 14.03.2023 at 12.30 PM and also to submit their response, if any, one working day prior to date of hearing i.e. 13.032023.

9. That, on the date of hearing. Shri Sourabh Krishna, Company Secretary appeared on behalf of Shri Sanjay Jaiswal, however, no submission has been made regarding non­compliance. Hence, it is concluded that the provisions of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 has been contravened by the auditor and therefore he is liable for penalty u/s. 450 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the Financial Year 31.03.2021.

Section 450 states that:- “If a company or any officer of a company or any other person contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, or any condition, limitation or restriction subject to which any approval, sanction, consent, confirmation, recognition, direction or exemption in relation to any matter has been accorded, given or granted, and for which no penalty or punishment is provided elsewhere in this Act, the company and every officer of the company who is in default or such other person shall be liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees, and in case of continuing contravention, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which the contravention continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty thousand rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person”.

10. Further Section 446B states that “if penalty is payable for non-compliance of any of the provisions of this Act by a One Person Company, small company, start-up company or Producer Company, or by any of its officer in default, or any other person in respect of such company, then such company, its officer in default or any other person, as the case may be, shall be liable to a penalty which shall not be more than one-half of the penalty specified in such provisions subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and one lakh rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person, as the case may be”.

11. As per clause 85 of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, small company means a company whose paid up capital and turnover shall not exceed rupees four crore and rupees forty crore respectively. As per MCA portal, paid up capital of the company- Tilak Proficient Nidhi Limited is Rs. 98,72,100/- and the revenue from operation is Rs. 1,14,38,225.58 as per balance sheet of the financial Year 31.03.2020. Therefore, the benefits of small company are extended to this noticee while adjudicating penalty.

ORDER

12. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and after taking into account the provisions of Rule-11 of Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 (as amended), I hereby impose a penalty on Shri Sanjay Jaiswal, Chartered Accountants as per Table Below for failure in compliance of section 143(3)(d) of the Companies Act, 2013 for the Financial Years 31.03.2021:

Nature of default Violation of Section of the Companies Act, 2013  Company/ Officers to whom penalty imposed No. of days in default Penalty for defaults (Rs.) as per Section
450 of the
Act
Total Penalty (Rs.) Penalty Imposed (Rs.) As per Sec. 446B of the Act
Non- reporting of violations in audit report Section
143
Shri  Sanjay Jaiswal, Chartered Accountants- 31.03.2021 Rs.10000 Rs.10000 5,000

13. The noticee shall pay the amount of penalty individually by way of e-payment (available on Ministry website www. mca.gov. in) under “Pay miscellaneous fees” category in MCA fee and payment Services within 90 (ninety) days of this order. The Challan/SRN generated after payment of penalty through online mode shall be forwarded to this office.

14. Appeal against this order may be filled in writing with the Regional Director (ER), Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Kolkata, within a period of 60 (sixty) days from the date of receipt of this order, in Form ADJ (available on Ministry website mca.gov.in) setting forth the grounds of appeal and shall be accompanied by a certified copy of this order {Section 454(5) and 454(6) of the Act read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014)

15. Please note that if the noticee does not pay the penalty amount imposed herein within a period of ninety days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order, he shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to six months or with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both in terms of section 454(8)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013; apart from the liability to pay the penalty amount in compliance to this order, and for which prosecution will be filed without further notice in this regard.

(Apar Barua)
Adjudicating Officer &
Registrar of Companies-Cum-
Official Liquidator, Patna

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031