Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : V V Titanium Pigments Private Limited Vs ACIT (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-2015
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
V V Titanium Pigments Private Limited Vs ACIT (Madras High Court) Madras High Court held that any order made under Section 220 (6) of the Income Tax must be a speaking order. Accordingly, impugned order set aside as being cryptic and non-speaking. Facts- Aa search was carried out on 25.10.2018 in the factory of the Petitioner. The same was temporarily concluded on 28.10.2018 with Prohibitory Orders. In the panchnama drawn at the end of search, it was mentioned that the warrant is in the names of various individuals & business entities including the petitioner’s name. There are no individ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930