This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 69A Addition unsustainable as cash withdrawn was more than deposits due to demonetization
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ajit Bapu Satam Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017–18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ajit Bapu Satam Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Held that cash withdrawn by the assessee from the bank was much more than the amount deposited due to demonetization. Further, there is no findings by the authorities that this cash available with the assessee was invested or utilised for any other purpose. Hence, addition u/s 69A unsustainable
Facts- Assessee made cash deposits of Rs. 20 Lakhs in his bank account during the demonetization period. AO treated the said cash deposits as unexplained money and added the same to the total income of the assessee u/s 69A of the Act. CIT(A) also di...





