Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sh. Nagendra Kumar Biyani Vs Indiabulls Real Estate Ltd. (NAA)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sh. Nagendra Kumar Biyani Vs Indiabulls Real Estate Ltd. (NAA) The Respondent has contended that Section 171 of the CGST Act and Rule 126 of the CGST Rules are violative of Article 14 and Article 19 of the Constitution of India. In this connection, this Authority holds that the Authority has not acted in any way as price controller or regulator as it doesn’t have the mandate to regulate the same. The Respondent is absolutely free to exercise his right to practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business, as per the provisions of Article 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Co...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031