National Anti-Profiteering Authority

Increase in base price of product, post-GST rate reduction is profiteering: NAA

Mr. Mohammad Azid Ramzani Vs M/s Adarsh Marbles (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Mr. Mohammad Azid Ramzani Vs M/s Adarsh Marbles (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) It is revealed that the Central Govt. vide Notification No.41/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 had reduced the rate of GST from 28% to 18% in respect of the tiles with effect from 15.11.2017. the benefit of which was required to be passed on to ...

Read More

Profiteering cannot be alleged in absence of GST Rate reduction: NAA

Sh. Rahul Sharma Vs. M/s H P India Sales Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Sh. Rahul Sharma Vs. M/s H P India Sales Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) The allegation of the Applicant  was that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of rate reduction for the product ‘Computer Monitor of 19.5 inch’ w.e.f. 01.01.2019. We find that there was no rate reduction in tax on the product [&...

Read More

Builder entitled to opt for paying GST @8%: NAA

Shri Arjun Kumar Parwani Vs M/s Signature Builders Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Shri Arjun Kumar Parwani Vs M/s. Signature Builders Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) On the basis of the facts of the present case it is clear that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he is not required to pass on its benefit. The above Applicant has also quoted […]...

Read More

Anti-Profiteering not established when No ITC was available: NAA

Shri Ramesh Kumar Yadav Vs M/s Vatika Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Shri Ramesh Kumar Yadav Vs M/s Vatika Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) The contentions of Applicant No. 1 mainly stress upon the fact that the construction was not completed before the GST had come into force and the payment was made by him in the GST regime along with GST. He had also alleged that the […]...

Read More

‘Unicharm’ not passed tax reduction benefit on Sanitary Napkins: NAA

Shri C. P. Rao Vs M/s Unicharm India Pvt. Ltd. (NAA)

Shri C. P. Rao Vs M/s Unicharm India Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) It is revealed that the Central Govt. vide Notification No.19/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 26.07.2018 the Government had reduced the rate of GST from 12% to NIL without ITC in respect of  Sanitary Napkins with effect from 27.07.2018, the benefit of which was required to […]...

Read More

Benefit of reduction in rate of GST not passed; Anti Profiteering provisions contravened

Mr. Mohammad Azid Ramzani Vs Director General of Anti-Profiteering (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Mr. Mohammad Azid Ramzani Vs Director General of Anti-Profiteering (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) It is revealed that the Central Govt. vide Notification No.41/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 had reduced the rate of GST from 28% to 18% in respect of the tiles with effect from 15.11.2017. the benefit of which was required ...

Read More

Dealer not passed GST Rate reduction benefit on Sanitary napkin: NAA

Sh. Pranesh Pathak Vs M/s. Bhutani International Medicos (NAA)

Sh. Pranesh Pathak Vs M/s. Bhutani International Medicos (NAA) Central Government, on the recommendation of the GST Council, had reduced the GST rate on the product ‘Sanitary towels (pads) or sanitary napkins; tampons’ from 12% to Nil w.e.f. 27.07.2018, vide S. No. 146 of the Schedule to Notification No. 19/2018-Central Tax (R...

Read More

NAA found Liberty Shoe dealer Guilty of Profiteering

Sh. Saurabh Gahoi Vs M/s Pinky Sales (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Sh. Saurabh Gahoi Vs M/s Pinky Sales (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) The Respondent had submitted that he was running an exclusive showroom of M/s Liberty Shoe Ltd.. which had given him the software which was being used for billing and he could not make any modification to this software since it was fully controlled by M/s [&hellip...

Read More

Builder realised more price by issuing incorrect tax invoices- Guilty of Anti-Profiteering

Sh. Peeyush Awasthi Vs M/s Sun Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Sh. Peeyush Awasthi Vs Director General of Anti-Profiteering (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) Respondent has denied benefit of ITC to the Applicants as well as the rest 36 purchasers of flats in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and has thus realized more price from them than what he was [&hell...

Read More

NAA found builder guilty of Additional GST realisation by issuing incorrect invoices

Shri Deepak Kumar Khurana Vs M/s Sattva Developers Pvt Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Shri Deepak Kumar Khurana Vs M/s Sattva Developers Pvt Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) The Respondent has himself admitted that there has been benefit of ITC derived and the benefit has been passed on by him to all his customers with whom agreements were entered on or before 30.06.2017. According to him the benefit has been [&...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,177)
Company Law (4,835)
Custom Duty (7,322)
DGFT (3,953)
Excise Duty (4,224)
Fema / RBI (3,779)
Finance (3,954)
Income Tax (30,250)
SEBI (3,147)
Service Tax (3,460)