National Anti-Profiteering Authority

NAA directs DGAP to reinvestigate alleged profiteering by Prestige Estate Projects Ltd.

Deepak Naik Vs Prestige Estate Projects Ltd. (NAA)

Deepak Naik Vs Prestige Estate Projects Ltd. (NAA) We find this to be a fit case where the Respondent’s claim of having passed on the benefit to his recipients/homebuyers requires to be verified against third party evidence in the form of written acknowledgements receipts from the homebuyers evidencing the receipt of the benefit, in...

Read More

‘Dough Makers India Pvt. Ltd’ guilty of Profiteering: NAA

DCIT Vs Dough Makers India Pvt. Ltd (NAA)

DCIT Vs Dough Makers India Pvt. Ltd (NAA) It was alleged that Respondent No. 1 supplying restaurant service has increased the base prices of his products and has not passed on the benefit of reduction in the GST rate from 18% to 5% w.e.f. 15.11.2017, affected vide Notification No. 46/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 by […]...

Read More

Subwest Restaurant not passed benefit of GST rate reduction: NAA

Hussain Shoaib Kothalia Vs Subwest Restaurant LLP (NAA)

Hussain Shoaib Kothalia Vs Subwest Restaurant LLP  (NAA) The brief facts of the case are that an application was filed by the Applicant No. 1 with the Maharashtra State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering alleging profiteering in respect of restaurant service supplied by the Respondent despite the reduction in the rate of GST from 1...

Read More

Anti-Profiteering penalty not in existence between period w.e.f. 01.07.2017 to 31.12.2018

Potnoor Naveen Vs Caroa Properties LLP (NAA)

Potnoor Naveen Vs Caroa Properties LLP (NAA) NAA held that Since, no penalty provisions were in existence between the period w.e.f. 01.07.2017 to 31.12.2018 when the Respondent had violated the provisions of Section 171 (1), the penalty prescribed under Section 171 (3A) cannot be imposed on the Respondent retrospectively. Accordingly, the...

Read More

Section 171(1) violation not covered U/s. 122(1)(i) of CGST Act, 2017

Crown Express Dental Lab Vs Theco India Private Limited (NAA)

Crown Express Dental Lab Vs Theco India Private Limited (NAA) From the perusal of Section 122 (1) (i) of the CGST Act, 2017, it is clear that the violation of the provisions of Section 171 (1) is not covered under Section 122 (1) (i) of the CGST Act, 2017 as it does not provide penalty […]...

Read More

No penalty for Violation of Section 171(1) occurred before 01.01.2020

Mohit Arora Vs Lodha Developers Ltd (NAA)

Mohit Arora Vs Lodha Developers Ltd (NAA) Since no penalty provisions were in existence between the period w.e.f. 01.07.2017 to 31.08.2018 when the Respondent had violated the provisions of Section 171 (1), the penalty prescribed under Section 171 (3A) cannot be imposed on the Respondent retrospectively. Accordingly, the notice dated 18.1...

Read More

Inox Leisure guilty of not passing benefit of reduction in GST rate: NAA

Shri. I.P Saji Vs Inox Leisure Pvt. Ltd. (NAA)

Shri. I.P Saji Vs Inox Leisure Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering from Applicant No. 1, alleging profiteering in respect of the supply of restaurant service despite a reduction in the rate of GST from 18% to 5% w.e.f. 15.11.2017. […]...

Read More

No penalty under Section 122(1)(i) for violation of Anti Profiteering Provisions

Shri Surya Prakash Loonkar Vs M/s Excel Rasayan Pvt. Ltd. (NAA)

Shri Surya Prakash Loonkar Vs M/s Excel Rasayan Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) From the perusal of Section 122 (1) (i) of the CGST Act, 2017, it is clear that the violation of the provisions of Section 171 (1) is not covered under Section 122 (1) (i) of the CGST Act, 2017 as it does not provide […]...

Read More

No penalty for violation of Section 171(1) provisions before 01.01.2020

Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Raj & Company (NAA)

Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Raj & Company (NAA) Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2019 specific penalty provisions have been added for violation of the provisions of Section 171(1) which have come in to force w.e.f. 01.01.2020, by inserting Section 171 (3A). Since, no penalty provisions were in existence between the period ...

Read More

Penalty for violation of Section 171(1) effective from 01.01.2020

Director General Of Anti-Profiteering Vs Raj & Company (NAA)

Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Raj & Company (NAA) 1. The brief facts of the present case are that the DGAP vide his Report dated 08.08.2018, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation and found that […...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (5,378)
Company Law (7,230)
Custom Duty (8,447)
DGFT (4,523)
Excise Duty (4,474)
Fema / RBI (4,646)
Finance (4,917)
Income Tax (36,825)
SEBI (3,941)
Service Tax (3,706)

Search Posts by Date

May 2021
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31