Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sh. Nagendra Kumar Biyani Vs Indiabulls Real Estate Ltd. (NAA)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sh. Nagendra Kumar Biyani Vs Indiabulls Real Estate Ltd. (NAA)

The Respondent has contended that Section 171 of the CGST Act and Rule 126 of the CGST Rules are violative of Article 14 and Article 19 of the Constitution of India. In this connection, this Authority holds that the Authority has not acted in any way as price controller or regulator as it doesn’t have the mandate to regulate the same. The Respondent is absolutely free to exercise his right to practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930