Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

GST exempt on pure services provided to Central/State Govt or UT related to functions entrusted to Municipalities/Panchayats

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2021 taxguru.in 3045
Case Name
In re Jayesh Anil Kumar Dalal (GST AAAR Uttar Pradesh)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement


In re Jayesh Anil Kumar Dalal (GST AAAR Uttar Pradesh)

In view of the above discussion, we hold that the services rendered by the  Appellant to the State Urban Development Agency,Uttar Pradesh (SUDA), and For PMAY, are in relation to functions entrusted to Municipalities under Article 243W and to Panchayats under Article 243W of the Constitution of India and such services would Qualify as pure Service (excluding works contract service or other composite supplies involving supply of any goods) and eligible for exemption from levy of CGST and UPGST, respectively.

FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF APPELLATE AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH

The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttar Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and UPGST Act”) by M/s. Jayesh A Dalai, Shop No. 4, J.S. Market, Suhag Nagar, Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the “Appellant”) against the Advance Ruling Order No. UP ADRG 71/2021 dated 21.01.2021 issued by the Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh.

At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the UPGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act, 2017 would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the UPGST Act, 2017 and vice versa.

Brief Facts of the Case

1) M/s Jayesh A Dalai, a proprietorship firm, having registered address at Shop No. 4, J. S. Market, Suhag Nagar, Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh, 283203 (the Appellant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTN: 09AAVPD9Q61B1ZK.

2) As per Appellant, there is an agreement between Director, State Urban Development Agency (herein after referred to as “SUDA”), and M/s Jayesh A Dalai, Jalaram Shakti beside Dhavalgiri Apartments, Near Lourdes Convent School, Athwalines, Surat, for Preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) for Ghaziabad NN ULB (District – Ghaziabad) in Meerut Cluster No. 14 and providing Project Management Consultancy (PMC) services for Project under Beneficiary Led Construction in 18 Clusters vide work order no. 1190/01 /29/HFA/ 2018-19 dated 16/01/2019.

3). Accordingly, the Appellant has submitted an application dated 06.11.2020, before the Authority for Advance Ruling Uttar Pradesh and sought Advance Ruling as follows : –

(i) Whether the Project Development Service (i.e. Detailed Project Report Service) and Project Management Consultancy services (‘PMCS’) provided by the applicant to the recipient under the Contract from State Urban Development Authority (herein after referred as “SUDA”) and the Project Management Consultancy services (‘PMC’) under the Contract for PMAY would qualify as an activity in relation to function entrusted to Panchayat or Municipality under Article 243G or Article 243W respectively, of the Constitution of India?

(ii) If answer to first question is in affirmative then, whether such services provided by the applicant would qualify as Pure services (excluding works contract service or composite supplies involving supply of any goods) as provided in serial number 3 of Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 June, 2017, as amended (S. No. 3A) by Notification No. 2/2018- Central Tax (Rate) dated 25 January, 2018 issued under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (‘CGST’) and corresponding Notifications No. – KA.N.I.-2-843/X1- 9 (47) / 17-UP. Act-1 – 2017 – Order – (10) – 2017 Lucknow, dated June 30, 2017 issued under Uttar Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (‘UPGST Act’), where the Project cost includes the cost of service rendered along with reimbursement of cost of procurement of goods for rendering such service, and, thus, be eligible for exemption from levy of CGST and UPGST, respectively.

4). The Authority for Advance Ruling, vide Order No. 72/2021 dated 21.01.2021 ruled that:

(i) Project Development Service provided by the applicant to the State Urban Development Authority and the Project Management Consultancy services (‘PMCj under the Contract for PMAY will not qualify as an activity in relation to function entrusted to Panchayat or Municipality under Article 243G or Article 243W respectively, of the Constitution of India.

(ii) As the answer to first question is in negative, question number 2 becomes redundant.

5) Being aggrieved with the Order No. 72/2021 dated 21.01.2021, the Appellant filed this appeal application before us.

Grounds of appeal submitted by the Appellant:-

6) The Appellant made the following grounds for filing of appeal:

6.1) the Authority for Advance Ruling, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh had passed a non-speaking order without proper analysis of the facts of the case.

6.2) The activities involved in preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and project management consultancy (PMC) services are pure professional consultancy service i.e. consulting engineer. In other words, there is no involvement / supplies of any types of goods or materials in this work order.

6.3) SUDA deducts GST-TDS amount from each and every payment made to the Appellant under section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017 so SUDA is considered here as a Government body for exemption from GST under SI. No. 3 (Heading 9954) of the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

6.4) The Appellant also relied upon various Advance Ruling Authority Judgments to vindicate their stand.

7) Following the principle of natural Justice, the appellant was granted personal hearing on 14th June 2021. Sh. Narendra Kumar, Chartered Accountant /Authorised Representative appeared in personal hearing on behalf of the Appellant.

During the course of personal hearing, he reiterated the submissions already made vide appeal application dated 06.04.2021. He has nothing more to add.

DISCUSSION AND FINDING

8) We have gone through the submissions made by the Appellant and examined the detailed explanation submitted by them. We observe that the question before us to decide is whether the services provided by the Appellant to the SUDA would qualify as an activity in relation to function entrusted to Panchayat or Municipality under Article 243G and 243W of the Constitution of India and whether these services would qualify as Pure Services or not.

9) Now coming to the first question we observe that as per SI. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 “Pure services (excluding works contract service or other composite supplies involving supply of any goods) provided to the Central Government, State Government or Union territory or local authority or a Governmental authority by way of any activity in relation to any function entrusted to a Panchayat under article 243G of the Constitution or in relation to any function entrusted to a Municipality under article 243W of the Constitution” are exempt from tax.

10). We observe that the Authority for Advance Ruling has observed that SUDA is not covered in the definition of Central Government, State Government, Local Authority, Government Authority or Government Entity. In this regard we observe that SUDA has been established as a state level nodal agency, under the department for Urban Employment and Poverty Alleviation by Uttar Pradesh Government and this fact is agreed upon even by the Advance Ruling Authority also. Further, as per the “Memorandum of Association of State Urban Development Agency”, it’s main objectives shall be-

(a) To identify the urban poor in the state.

(b) To draw up plans and formulate schemes for the upliftment of the urban poor in the state.

(c) To implement schemes for the benefit of the urban poor either directly or through other agencies engaged in this direction, whether private, public or cooperative.

(d) To review the progress of the execution of these activities as well as effectiveness of the benefits directed towards the urban poor.

(e) To set up or establish any specific service such as training facilities, infrastructural etc. in furtherance of the economic interest of the urban poor.

11). As per the Memorandum of Association, the Secretary, Urban Employment & Poverty alleviation Programe, will be the Chairman of the SUDA. Further, as per point no. 33 of Article of Association the accounts of the SUDA shall be subject to an account audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India and as per point no. 43 ”Members to receive no profit upon dissolution of the society if after disposal and settlement of the property of the society and its claims and liabilities, there are any surplus assets, such asset shall not be paid to or distributed amongst the member of the society or any of them but shall be disposed off as directed by the Government of India or State Government”. Moreover, as per the registration certificate issued by the GST department, SUDA has been defined as “Government Department”.

12). Further, as per website of Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana-Housing for All (Urban), Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, the PMAY is a Scheme to provide central assistance to Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) and other implementing agencies through States/UTs for Rehabilitation of existing slum dwellers using their land as a resource through private, participation, and affordable Housing in Partnership. As per the detail available on website SUDA is the state level nodal agency for PMAY(U) in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

13). Now coming to the functions entrusted to Panchayats/Municipalities, the matters listed in the 11th and 12th schedule to the constitution (details 243G and 243W, respectively), are inter alia: (a) Safe water for drinking, (b) Maintenance of community assets, (c) Family welfare, (d) Markets and Fairs, (e) Poverty Alleviation Programmes, (f) Regulation of land use and construction of land buildings, (g) Urban planning including the town planning, (h) Planning for economic and social development, (i) Urban poverty alleviation, (j) Slum improvement and up-gradation etc. Further as per the preface to the PMAY, Housing for All (Urban) Scheme Guidelines:-

“The Mission seeks to address the affordable housing requirement in urban areas through following programme verticals:

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.