Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prestige Estates Projects Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 813/Bang/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/03/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2014-2015
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Prestige Estates Projects Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)

In our opinion, even if it is advance payment, it is not linked to the transfer of immovable property as enumerated in Section 194-IA of the Act, since the condition laid down in Section 2(47)(v) of the Act was not complied with within the meaning of Section 53A of the T.P. Act, so as to deduct TDS by the assessee on the said refundable security The assessee cannot be hold as the assessee in default u/s. 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act. It is ordered accordingly.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-13, Bangalore, dated 14.02.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2014-2015.

2. The assessee has raised the following grounds :

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031