Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dhimant Hiralal Thakar Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 487 OF 1997
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/10/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Dhimant Hiralal Thakar vs CIT (Bombay High Court)- Requirement to claim a deduction under Section 37 which is a residuary provision is that the expenditure must not be of the nature described in section 30 to 36; secondly the expenditure must not be capital in nature; thirdly the expenditure must have been laid down wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business/profession of the assessee; and fourthly the expenditure must not be personal in nature.

Applying these requirements of the statutory provision and the settled position in law as noted by us in the above decisions, we have no hesitation to reach a conclusion that the applicant is not entitled to claim deduction in respect of the expenditure incurred by him on foreign tour undertaken by him in the assessment year in question for the purpose of pre-operative treatment of his eyes. It cannot be disputed that the expenditure of Rs.43,600/- on foreign tour claimed to be undertaken by the appellant is for the purpose of pre-operation investigation of his eyes.

We are not persuaded to accept the submission on behalf of the applicant that eyes are required to be exclusively used for the purpose of profession by the applicant. As observed above eyes are an important organ of the human body and is essential for the efficient survival of a human being. Eyes are thus essential not only for the purpose of business or profession but for purposes other than these which are so many. It is therefore clear that the said expenditure as claimed by the applicant is not in the nature of the expenditure wholly and exclusively incurred for the purposes of the profession of the applicant and thus this expenditure cannot be claimed by the applicant to be allowed as deduction in computing the income chargeable under the head profits and gains from business or profession in case of the applicant as per the provisions of Section 37 of the Act.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031