Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT vs. M/s D. Chetan & Co. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No-278/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 01.10.2016
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
CA Saurabh Chokhra
ca-saurabh-chokra

Brief of the case:

  • The Hon’ble Bombay HC in the above-cited case held that mark to market loss in respect of forward contracts claimed as loss from Business income cannot be disallowed as the forward contracts were secured for to cover variation in the foreign exchange rate which would impact its business of import and export of diamonds.
  • Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031