Case Law Details
Case Name : The Commissioner of Income-tax, Dehradun Vs Arthusa Offshore Company (Uttarakhand High Court at Nainital)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Uttarakhand High Court
ITAT has erred in law in holding that word “tax” does not include “surcharge” for the purposes of Clause (2) of Article 14 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement with USA, and in upholding the decision of the CIT(Appeals), reducing the tax rate applicable to assessee NRC at 60 per cent instead of 65 per cent applied by the AO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
INCOME TAX APPEAL (ITA) 46 of 2007
1. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Dehradun.
2. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle -1, Dehradun……….Petitioner(s)
Versus
Arthusa Offshore Comp...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

