Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income-tax, Dehradun Vs Arthusa Offshore Company (Uttarakhand High Court at Nainital)
Related Assessment Year :
ITAT has erred in law in holding that word “tax” does not include “surcharge” for the purposes of Clause (2) of Article 14 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement with USA, and in upholding the decision of the CIT(Appeals), reducing the tax rate applicable to assessee NRC at 60 per cent instead of 65 per cent applied by the AO IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL INCOME TAX APPEAL (ITA) 46 of 2007 1. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Dehradun. 2. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle -1, Dehradun……….Petitioner(s) Versus Arthusa Offshore Comp...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930