Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income-tax, Dehradun Vs Arthusa Offshore Company (Uttarakhand High Court at Nainital)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal (ITA) 46 of 2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/03/2008
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

ITAT has erred in law in holding that word “tax” does not include “surcharge” for the purposes of Clause (2) of Article 14 of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement with USA, and in upholding the decision of the CIT(Appeals), reducing the tax rate applicable to assessee NRC at 60 per cent instead of 65 per cent applied by the AO

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

INCOME TAX APPEAL (ITA) 46 of 2007

1. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Dehradun.

2. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle -1, Dehradun……….Petitioner(s)

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031