Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty imposable under main provisions of section 271(1)(c) and there is no need to refer to any Explanations

Case Law Details

Case Name
Harish P. Mashruwale HUF Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
ITAT Mumbai
Advertisement CASE LAWS DETAILS DECIDED BY: ITAT, MUMBAI BENCHES `F’ : MUMBAI, IN THE CASE OF: Harish P. Mashruwale HUF Vs. ACIT, APPEAL NO: ITA No. 4996/Mum/2007, DECIDED ON March 30, 2010 RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 6. The assessee has challenged the levy of penalty on three grounds. Firstly, the assessee has argued that the penalty proceedings have been initiated for concealing the particulars of income but the penalty has been imposed for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and, therefore, penalty is legally invalid. Reliance has placed on several judgements of Honourable High Cou...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *