This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty imposable under main provisions of section 271(1)(c) and there is no need to refer to any Explanations
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Harish P. Mashruwale HUF Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
CASE LAWS DETAILS
DECIDED BY: ITAT, MUMBAI BENCHES `F’ : MUMBAI,
IN THE CASE OF: Harish P. Mashruwale HUF Vs. ACIT, APPEAL NO: ITA No. 4996/Mum/2007, DECIDED ON March 30, 2010
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH
6. The assessee has challenged the levy of penalty on three grounds. Firstly, the assessee has argued that the penalty proceedings have been initiated for concealing the particulars of income but the penalty has been imposed for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and, therefore, penalty is legally invalid. Reliance has placed on several judgements of Honourable High Cou...





