This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand as Installation Service Was Misclassified as Works Contract
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- 3 M India Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (LTU) (CESTAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
3 M India Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (LTU) (CESTAT Bangalore)
In 3 M India Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (LTU), the CESTAT Bangalore examined whether differential service tax could be demanded by reclassifying services already taxed under “Erection, Commissioning or Installation Service” as “Works Contract Service.”
The appellant was registered with the Service Tax Department for providing services including erection, commissioning and installation services, and maintenance and repair services. During scrutiny of ST-3 returns for the period e...
Author Info
