Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited Vs Principal Commissioner (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited Vs Principal Commissioner (CESTAT Mumbai) Asset reconstruction company trustee services not taxable under banking & financial services – Demand of over Rs. 50 crores set aside; mutuality principle applied: CESTAT Mumbai The appellant is the largest Asset Reconstruction Company in India. It is registered as an NBFC. It floats a “trust” for liquidation of NPAs of banks. It issues security receipts (SR) in terms of Section 7 and 7A of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. It receives management fees for managing the trust as the trustee. It also earns ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031