Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Vinay Kumar Gupta (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Vinay Kumar Gupta (ITAT Mumbai) The core issue was whether a reassessment notice issued on 31.07.2022 was within the limitation period considering extensions under TOLA and the Supreme Court rulings in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal. The Revenue argued that extended timelines and legal fiction under Ashish Agarwal preserved the validity of notices and allowed sufficient time to complete reassessment. However, the Tribunal applied the computation method laid down by the Supreme Court in Rajeev Bansal, which requires calculating the “surviving time” after factoring exclusions (incl...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031