Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Harsha Rajan Mehrotra Vs NFAC/Circle (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Harsha Rajan Mehrotra Vs NFAC/Circle (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai ITAT deleted the addition of ₹29.22 lakh made under Section 56(2)(x), holding that stamp duty value as on the date of booking/allotment (and not registration) must be adopted where consideration is fixed earlier and payments are made through banking channels. The AO had taxed the difference between: Purchase consideration: ₹80.92 lakh Stamp duty value (on registration): ₹1.10 crore treating ₹29.22 lakh as income. However, the Tribunal noted: The property was booked in 2012, and consideration was substantially fixed then, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031