Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jignesh Manojkumar Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jignesh Manojkumar Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained The AO made an addition of ₹3.80 lakh u/s 68 treating cash introduced into capital account as unexplained, despite the assessee explaining it as coming from past savings and loans. The ITAT noted that: The assessee had sufficient past income and cash availability reflected in earlier balance sheet, He had been earning income for over two decades, and The amount involved was relatively small compared to declared income (₹1.38 crore). The Tribunal held that in such c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031