Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gangadhar Gopinath Wagh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gangadhar Gopinath Wagh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) In this case, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on a salaried assessee for claiming excess deductions, allegedly resulting in inaccurate particulars of income. Key facts: Assessee’s return was filed by a tax consultant who fraudulently claimed excess deductions without the assessee’s knowledge. On discovering the issue: Assessee voluntarily paid tax + interest (before issue of notice u/s 148) Filed correct return in response to notice AO still levied penalty, upheld by CIT(A), on ground that correction was not voluntary ITAT Findings: Assesse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031