Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gangadhar Gopinath Wagh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gangadhar Gopinath Wagh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) In this case, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on a salaried assessee for claiming excess deductions, allegedly resulting in inaccurate particulars of income. Key facts: Assessee’s return was filed by a tax consultant who fraudulently claimed excess deductions without the assessee’s knowledge. On discovering the issue: Assessee voluntarily paid tax + interest (before issue of notice u/s 148) Filed correct return in response to notice AO still levied penalty, upheld by CIT(A), on ground that correction was not voluntary ITAT Findings: Assesse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930