Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gangadhar Gopinath Wagh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gangadhar Gopinath Wagh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) In this case, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on a salaried assessee for claiming excess deductions, allegedly resulting in inaccurate particulars of income. Key facts: Assessee’s return was filed by a tax consultant who fraudulently claimed excess deductions without the assessee’s knowledge. On discovering the issue: Assessee voluntarily paid tax + interest (before issue of notice u/s 148) Filed correct return in response to notice AO still levied penalty, upheld by CIT(A), on ground that correction was not voluntary ITAT Findings: Assesse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930