Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Suma Narsimha Rao Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Smt. Suma Narsimha Rao Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore: Mere Wrong Claim u/s 54 Does Not Attract Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) The Bangalore ITAT deleted penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) where the assessee, a non-resident, had claimed deduction under Section 54 on reinvestment of capital gains. Although the claim was disallowed because the sale deed was executed beyond the prescribed time, the Tribunal held that substantial investment was made within the stipulated period, and all facts were fully disclosed in the return. The Tribunal emphasized that the issue was debatable and arguable,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening on Change of Opinion Invalid: ITAT Quashes Entire Assessment CIT(A)’s Non-Speaking Order & Failure to Address Legal Ground- Matter Remanded Section 12AB Registration Cannot Be Denied for Missing Irrevocability Clause Alone: ITAT Follows Bombay HC Reassessment Time-Barred Despite TOLA & Ashish Agarwal: ITAT Upholds Quashing Registration Cannot Be Denied for Technical Defect: ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930