Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Suma Narsimha Rao Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Smt. Suma Narsimha Rao Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore: Mere Wrong Claim u/s 54 Does Not Attract Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) The Bangalore ITAT deleted penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) where the assessee, a non-resident, had claimed deduction under Section 54 on reinvestment of capital gains. Although the claim was disallowed because the sale deed was executed beyond the prescribed time, the Tribunal held that substantial investment was made within the stipulated period, and all facts were fully disclosed in the return. The Tribunal emphasized that the issue was debatable and arguable,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031