Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Govindan Gnanavel Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Govindan Gnanavel Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai Quashes Reassessment – Notice u/s 148 Invalid for Want of Approval from Correct Authority u/s 15 The assessee had not filed a return of income and the AO noticed cash deposits of ₹6.64 crore in the bank account. Based on this information, reassessment proceedings were initiated by issuing notice u/s 148A(b) followed by an order u/s 148A(d) and notice u/s 148. The AO completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B and made an addition of ₹6.64 crore u/s 69A as unexplained money. The CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Before the ITAT, the assesse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty Reassessment Quashed for Wrong Sanction: ITAT Bangalore Strikes Down 147 Order for Breach of Section 151 Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Delay in Form 67 – ITAT Remands for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031