Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pakarahalli Narayanappa Srinivasgowda Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pakarahalli Narayanappa Srinivasgowda Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The assessee was alleged to have received ₹22.13 crore in connection with a property transaction where he was a confirming party. Based on this information, the AO issued a notice u/s 148 on 29-06-2021 under the old reassessment regime. Following the Supreme Court decision in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal, such notices were treated as show-cause notices under the new regime and the AO subsequently issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 20-05-2022, to which the assessee replied on 05-06-2022. Thereafter, the AO passed an order u/s 148A(d)...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031