Case Law Details
Case Name : Ammati Venkatachalapathisetty Satishkumar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ammati Venkatachalapathisetty Satishkumar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Presumptive Taxation U/s 44AD – Cash Deposits Within Turnover Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained – Additions Based Only on Survey Statement Deleted – ITAT Bangalore
Assessee, a retail trader running proprietary concern M/s Kumar Traders, declared income under presumptive scheme u/s 44AD. During survey proceedings, AO made multiple additions including ₹19 lakh cash deposits, ₹22.75 lakh investment in shop, ₹28.73 lakh income admitted during survey, and ₹22.75 lakh estimated profit based on alleged unaccoun...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


