Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dattatray Vithoba Sawant Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dattatray Vithoba Sawant Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment U/s 148 Quashed Where Escaped Income ₹2.58 Lakh & Notice Issued Beyond 3 Years – Wrong Sanction under Sec.151 – ITAT Mumbai The assessee challenged reassessment proceedings initiated under the new regime where notice u/s 148 dated 06.07.2022 was issued alleging escaped income of ₹2.58 lakh relating to deduction claims and allowance exemptions. The Tribunal first examined the legal grounds since they went to the root of jurisdiction. Relying on the Supreme Court ruling in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal, ITAT analyse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930