Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dattatray Vithoba Sawant Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dattatray Vithoba Sawant Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment U/s 148 Quashed Where Escaped Income ₹2.58 Lakh & Notice Issued Beyond 3 Years – Wrong Sanction under Sec.151 – ITAT Mumbai The assessee challenged reassessment proceedings initiated under the new regime where notice u/s 148 dated 06.07.2022 was issued alleging escaped income of ₹2.58 lakh relating to deduction claims and allowance exemptions. The Tribunal first examined the legal grounds since they went to the root of jurisdiction. Relying on the Supreme Court ruling in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal, ITAT analyse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930