Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajendra P. Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rajendra P. Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Addition u/s 69 for Penny Stock Investment Deleted – Explained Source Through Banking Channel Accepted – ITAT Mumbai The assessee challenged addition of ₹42.60 lakh made u/s 69 towards alleged unexplained investment in shares of Mind Vision Capital Ltd., which was treated by AO as suspicious penny stock transaction based on investigation wing inputs. The assessment was reopened u/s 147 and addition was made mainly on the ground that the assessee failed to furnish complete details of share transactions. Before ITAT, the assessee demonstrated t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930