Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandan Dhingadmal Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandan Dhingadmal Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable on Estimated Bogus Purchase Addition – ITAT Mumbai Deletes Penalty The assessee challenged penalty orders u/s 271(1)(c) for AYs 2010-11 & 2011-12 which were levied pursuant to additions made in reassessment proceedings on account of alleged bogus purchases. In quantum proceedings, the AO had added 12.5% of the purchases as profit element, which was later reduced by ITAT to 5%, thereby confirming that the addition itself was purely on estimation basis. The Tribunal observed that penalty for concealment cann...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930