Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandan Dhingadmal Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandan Dhingadmal Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable on Estimated Bogus Purchase Addition – ITAT Mumbai Deletes Penalty The assessee challenged penalty orders u/s 271(1)(c) for AYs 2010-11 & 2011-12 which were levied pursuant to additions made in reassessment proceedings on account of alleged bogus purchases. In quantum proceedings, the AO had added 12.5% of the purchases as profit element, which was later reduced by ITAT to 5%, thereby confirming that the addition itself was purely on estimation basis. The Tribunal observed that penalty for concealment cann...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031