Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tin Tar Retail Corp Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tin Tar Retail Corp Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Search Assessment – Suppressed Sales Deleted, Sec 37(1) Expenses Allowed & CWIP Write-Off Treated as Revenue – 143(3) Order Quashed – ITAT Mumbai Search u/s 132 led to parallel assessments u/s 143(3) & 153A for AY 2017-18. ITAT held that once search was initiated, assessment u/s 143(3) framed thereafter was invalid in view of 2nd proviso to Sec 153A and ratio of Abhisar Buildwell. Consequently, 143(3) order was quashed. On merits of 153A assessment, AO alleged suppressed sales of ₹96.77 lakh based on ERP data mismatch; however ITAT obse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930