Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohd. Ayyub Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mohd. Ayyub Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Time-barred notice kills reassessment: ITAT quashes 147 proceedings for AY 2015-16 relying on Rajeev Bansal- For AY 2015-16, notice could have been issued only up to 31-03-2022, subject to ₹50 lakh escapement condition Delhi ITAT allowed Assessee’s appeal &  quashed reassessment proceedings as being barred by limitation. Tribunal admitted additional legal ground under Rule 11, holding that validity of notice u/s 148 can be examined on admitted facts, relying on NTPC Ltd vs CIT. ITAT noted that notice u/s 148 was issued on 22-07-2022 for AY 2015-16, whic...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54 Deduction Allowed Despite Incomplete Documents – Substance Over Form Prevails Reassessment Quashed: Failure to Dispose Objections Makes 148 Proceedings Invalid- Bang Trib Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930