Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Venkata Ramanamma Sakamuri Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Venkata Ramanamma Sakamuri Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Reassessment Declared Void Ab Initio: ITAT Hyderabad Holds JAO Had No Authority to Issue Notices under Sections 148A and 148 Post–Notification 18/2022 The ITAT Hyderabad held that the reassessment framed for AY 2019–20 was invalid and void ab initio because the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (ITO, Ward-1, Nellore), rather than the Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), had issued the notice under Section 148A(b), passed the order under Section 148A(d), and issued the notice under Section 148. The Tribunal noted that after the introduction of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031