Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Venkata Ramanamma Sakamuri Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Venkata Ramanamma Sakamuri Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Reassessment Declared Void Ab Initio: ITAT Hyderabad Holds JAO Had No Authority to Issue Notices under Sections 148A and 148 Post–Notification 18/2022

The ITAT Hyderabad held that the reassessment framed for AY 2019–20 was invalid and void ab initio because the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (ITO, Ward-1, Nellore), rather than the Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO)Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031