Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

JAO cannot Sections 148A & 148 Notices Post–Notification 18/2022

Case Law Details

Case Name
Venkata Ramanamma Sakamuri Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2019-20
Advertisement Venkata Ramanamma Sakamuri Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Reassessment Declared Void Ab Initio: ITAT Hyderabad Holds JAO Had No Authority to Issue Notices under Sections 148A and 148 Post–Notification 18/2022 The ITAT Hyderabad held that the reassessment framed for AY 2019–20 was invalid and void ab initio because the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (ITO, Ward-1, Nellore), rather than the Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), had issued the notice under Section 148A(b), passed the order under Section 148A(d), and issued the notice under Section 148. The Tribunal noted that after the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sayyad Sadak
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Sayyad Sadak & Associates
Location: Hyderabad, Telangana
Articles Published: 56

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *