As the financial year draws to a close, one annual exercise quietly decides whether a business will stay compliant—or walk into unnecessary litigation: the GST Annual Return (GSTR-9) and GST Audit / Reconciliation Statement (GSTR-9C).
While the forms look straightforward, most disputes under GST begin from small mismatches, missed disclosures, or inconsistent records revealed during the annual return or audit. In many cases, these issues surface only when the department issues scrutiny notices or initiates inspection. In this article, let us explore mechanism to avoid disputes:
1. Why so much importance to GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C:
Both GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C have evolved into key tools for the GST Department to identify risk.
Today, they are used to:
- Reconcile turnover across GST, books and TDS/TCS statements
- Spot ITC red flags
- Detect mismatches linked to fake invoicing, non-disclosure, or short payment
- Flag cases for audit, inspection or investigation
- Identify high-risk sectors and taxpayers
A well-prepared annual return is therefore not a formality—it is an immunity against future litigation.
2. Common Errors in GST Annual Return (GSTR-9)
Turnover Mismatch: GST Returns vs Books
The biggest litigation trigger is turnover mismatch between:
- GSTR-1
- GSTR-3B
- Financial statements
- TDS/TCS returns
- E-invoicing data
Why it matters:
Turnover disputes often lead to SCNs alleging suppression, excess ITC, or short-payment—even when the mismatch is clerical.
Wrong Reporting of Advances, Credit Notes & Debit Notes
Businesses commonly misreport:
- Advances for services
- Credit notes issued after the financial year
- Debit notes raised independently
Why it matters:
Incorrect reporting distorts liability and reconciliation. Notices under Section 61 frequently arise from these mistakes.
Misclassification of Zero-Rated Supplies
Frequent errors include:
- Clubbing exports with SEZ supplies
- Overstating turnover due to foreign currency variations
- Reporting exports without LUT/Bond incorrectly
Why it matters:
These mistakes may lead to refund rejections or demands for reversal of ITC.
Not Disclosing Additional Liability Voluntarily
Many businesses hesitate to declare:
- Missed outward supplies
- ITC reversals
- Short-paid taxes
Why it matters:
Failing to self-report leads to avoidable interest, penalty, and sometimes investigation. The law favours voluntary correction.
3. Common Errors in GSTR-9C (Reconciliation Statement)
Incorrect Turnover Reconciliation
Most disputes arise when turnover is not correctly mapped from books to GST returns.
Examples include:
- Freight, forex adjustments, and incidental income
- Job-work charges and scrap sales
- Unbilled revenue and deferred revenue
ITC Mismatch Between Books and GSTR-2B
Typical flaws include:
- Claiming ITC not appearing in GSTR-2B
- Missing reversals under Rule 42/43
- Under-reporting blocked credit
Why it matters:
ITC mismatches drive 80% of GST investigations today.
Ignoring Ineligible ITC
Commonly missed categories:
- Motor vehicles and repair
- Food, catering, club expenses
- Works contract services
- Employee perquisites
- Goods lost, stolen or destroyed
If not reviewed annually, these items snowball into litigation.
Reconciliation of RCM Liabilities
Businesses often miss:
- RCM on legal services
- RCM on GTA
- RCM on import of services
RCM is a favorite scrutiny target because liabilities are easy to identify from financials.
4. Department’s Litigation Approach: What Recent Trends Show
Based on scrutiny patterns and notices, the department is focusing on:
- Turnover mismatch with 26AS/TDS
- ITC discrepancies with GSTR-2B
- Excess claim due to round-tripping or fake invoices
- Reporting errors in zero-rated supplies
- Non-reversal of ITC on exempt supply
Many recent notices rely entirely on data analytics—meaning your GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C are now being scanned by automated tools, not humans.
5. Practical Tips for Businesses and Professionals
- Begin Reconciliation Early
Don’t wait till the deadline. Start reconciling:
- GSTR-1 vs Books
- GSTR-3B vs GSTR-2B vs Books
- E-invoice vs E-way bill data
Early reconciliation reduces December-January stress.
- Review ITC Vendor-Wise
Ensure:
- Vendor filings match your 2B
- Suspicious or risky vendors are flagged
- ITC from non-compliant vendors is reviewed professionally
A vendor-driven ITC mismatch is one of the biggest litigation risks.
- Document Everything
Maintain:
- Ledger-wise and invoice-wise reconciliations
- Working papers for every adjustment
- DRC-03 payment proofs
- Management representations
Proper documentation often determines the outcome of scrutiny.
- Correct Mistakes Voluntarily
If you spot:
- Missed sales
- ITC wrongly claimed
- Reversals not made
Pay liability through DRC-03 and report it transparently.
- Train Accounts Teams
Most errors happen at the operator level.
Internal training goes a long way in preventing disputes.
- Maintain Year-End Checklists
Prepare checklists for:
- RCM
- Ineligible ITC
- Exempt turnover
- Credit notes
- Expense-ledger scans
- Fixed-asset ITC review
A simple checklist often saves months of litigation.
6. Turning GST Audit into a Compliance Strength
A well-prepared GSTR-9/9C is not only a defense document—it is your best opportunity to demonstrate transparency and intent.
When done correctly, it helps:
- Reduce scrutiny risk
- Minimize litigation
- Build a strong audit trail
- Improve refund processing
- Strengthen overall tax governance
In today’s regulatory environment, good compliance is good business.
7. Final Thought
GST audits should not be treated as a burden. They are a chance to correct mistakes, streamline systems, and protect the business from costly disputes. With the right planning, reconciliations, and documentation, GSTR-9/9C becomes a smooth annual exercise rather than an anxiety-driven deadline.
If businesses focus on accuracy rather than speed, GST litigation becomes far easier to avoid.
In case of any query and clarification regarding indirect taxation including GST and Customs, and require any professional support, you may like to connect with us.
*****
Abhinarayan Mishra FCA, FCS, LL.B, IP, RV; Partner, KPAM & Associates, Chartered Accountants, SAM Law Associates LLP. New Delhi ; +91 9910744992; ca.abhimishra@gmail.com; samlawassociates18@gmail.com
Author Bio
