Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Parul Diamond (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Parul Diamond (ITAT Mumbai) Bogus Purchase Saga Ends With 6% GP — Once Sales Accepted, Only Profit Element Taxable -ITAT Mumbai Rejects 100% Disallowance Revenue challenged restriction of addition to 6% of alleged bogus purchases of Rs. 6,66,602 from Mohit Enterprises, stated to be a Bhawarlal Jain accommodation entry concern, while Assessee (a diamond trader) filed CO seeking full deletion and attacking reopening u/s 148. Assessee had filed purchase bills, sales register, stock book, bank statements, export realisation certificates, confirmation from supplier, and an affidavit of pr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031