Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dineshkumar Ramchandra Tulsyan (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dineshkumar Ramchandra Tulsyan (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Survey Admission Retracted Next Day – SEBI Clean Chit Sinks Revenue Case: LTCG on Shares Restored Pune Tribunal considered additions made by AO by treating LTCG from sale of shares of Mishka Finance & Trading Ltd as bogus & denying exemption u/s 10(38). AO relied on survey statement recorded at 3.30 AM on 02.09.2015, Investigation Wing Kolkata reports on penny-stock accommodation entries, statements of operators, SEBI’s 2015 interim order & alleged abnormal price rise. AO assessed the sale consideration as unexplained ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031