Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pusa Nanda Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-2008
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Pusa Nanda Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

Wrong CA Advice & Covid Delay Accepted—Tribunal Orders De-Novo Examination of 153A Addition with No Incriminating Material

Assessee filed appeal with 868-day delay against CIT(A)’s order sustaining addition of ₹1,17,50,000/- u/s 50C in search assessment u/s 153A. Delay-condonation petition & affidavit explained that earlier CA wrongly advised not to appeal; later Assessee attempted settlement under Vivad-se-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment Under Section 147/144 Struck Down for Not Issuing Section 143(2) Despite Valid Return Survey-Based 8% Estimation Cut to 4%: ITAT Ensures Parity With Parents’ Cases Temple Vazhipadu vs Demonetisation: ITAT Deletes SBN Addition of Rs. 1.45 Lakh Vivad se Vishwas Opt-Out Does Not Bar Tax Appeal: ITAT Decision Section 96 Overrides Income Tax for Post-2014 Land Acquisitions View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031