Case Law Details
Case Name : Pusa Nanda Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-2008
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Hyderabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pusa Nanda Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Wrong CA Advice & Covid Delay Accepted—Tribunal Orders De-Novo Examination of 153A Addition with No Incriminating Material
Assessee filed appeal with 868-day delay against CIT(A)’s order sustaining addition of ₹1,17,50,000/- u/s 50C in search assessment u/s 153A. Delay-condonation petition & affidavit explained that earlier CA wrongly advised not to appeal; later Assessee attempted settlement under Vivad-se-Vishwas which was rejected due to prosecution u/s 276C(2); Covid-19 period further contributed to delay. Tribunal held that wrong...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


