Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Purav Mahendra Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Purav Mahendra Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Registration Alone of Agrement to Sell Doesn’t Trigger Capital Gains — Mumbai ITAT Applies ‘Transfer’ Principles Assessment was completed u/s 143(3) taxing capital gains of ₹80,76,511 on sale of three commercial units. CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Before Tribunal, Assessee submitted that only part consideration (between 5% to 13%) was received during FY 2014-15 & possession was never handed over. Agreements to Sell , though registered on 07.12.2014, specifically stated in Clause 7 & 8 that title transfer & possession would occu...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031