Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prakash Pandurang Patil Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Prakash Pandurang Patil Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)

The Bombay High Court heard a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act on 5 April 2022, along with a prior notice under Section 148A(b) and an order under Section 148A(d) for Assessment Year 2018-19. The petitioner argued that these actions were invalid because they were issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) and not through the mandatory faceless mechanism required under Section 151A of the Act and the CBDT’s notification dated 29

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031