This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Consistent Past Relief Continues: Mumbai ITAT Again Upholds ESOP Expense as Revenue u/s 37(1)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Avendus Capital Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2021-22
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Avendus Capital Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Tribunal examined Revenue’s challenge against CIT(A)’s order allowing deduction for ESOP expenditure claimed by Assessee, a management consultancy & investment banking company. AO treated ESOP cost of ₹3.80 crore as capital outlay on the ground that it related to issue of shares & increase in equity base, arguing that it did not constitute real expenditure & relied on the pending SLP in Biocon. CIT(A), however, followed multiple earlier orders in Assessee’s own case consistently holding ESOP cost to be a...






