Telangana High Court directed the tax authorities to accept a manual application for revocation of GST registration cancellation since the GST portal no longer permitted online filing.
Telangana High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and pursue the statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The Court directed the appellate authority to consider the delay sympathetically since the petitioner had approached the High Court first.
Telangana High Court directed authorities to accept a physical application for revocation of cancelled GST registration where the GST portal no longer permitted online filing. The Court granted relief after noting the cancellation arose from filing NIL returns.
Telangana High Court held that payment of outstanding GST dues during adjudication does not exempt a taxpayer from mandatory pre-deposit for filing an appeal. The Court clarified that penalty disputes must be decided by the appellate authority on merits.
Telangana High Court held that taxpayers cannot seek exemption from mandatory GST appellate pre-deposit merely because the disputed tax amount was already paid during adjudication.
ROC Haryana ruled that non-transfer of unspent CSR amount within six months from the close of the financial year constituted a violation attracting adjudication penalty proceedings.
The article explains how ecofeminism connects environmental exploitation with gender-based domination and violence. It argues that both arise from the same structures of control, extraction, and inequality.
Form 157 under the Income-tax Act, 2025 is not required for every person leaving India. The requirement applies only in limited cases involving tax investigations, financial irregularities, or large outstanding tax arrears.
The Supreme Court held that constitutional courts can grant bail in UAPA cases where prolonged incarceration and delayed trial violate Article 21. The Court clarified that statutory restrictions under Section 43D(5) cannot justify indefinite pre-trial detention.
Courts have held that distinct aspects of a single transaction may be taxed separately without creating constitutional conflict. The principle permits different legislatures to levy taxes on separate taxable elements of the same activity.
