The article explains how courts use the Gillette Defence to reject patent infringement claims when the accused product or process already existed as prior art. It highlights major rulings from India, the UK, Canada, and Europe that reinforce the principle that public knowledge cannot be monopolized.
ROC Patna imposed penalties on a Nidhi company and its Managing Director for failure to file financial statements under Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013. The balance sheet remained unfiled despite adjudication notice and hearing opportunity.
The ROC penalized a Nidhi company and its Managing Director for non-filing of financial statements under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.
The adjudication order explains how failure to file the FY 2022-23 balance sheet resulted in penalties on both the company and its managing director. The ruling emphasizes strict compliance obligations for annual financial statement filings.
The ROC imposed penalties on a Nidhi company and its Managing Director for non-filing of financial statements under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Patna penalized a company and its managing director for failing to file financial statements for FY 2016-17 under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The order highlights that continuous non-compliance can attract maximum statutory penalties.
This article explains mandatory website disclosure requirements under Regulations 46 and 62 of SEBI LODR Regulations, 2015. It highlights compliance obligations, recent amendments, and penalties for non-compliance.
This guide explains the complete legal procedure for shifting a company’s registered office within the same state but under a different ROC jurisdiction. It covers board approvals, RD approval, statutory forms, notices, timelines, and compliance requirements.
Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to file a physical application for revocation of cancelled GST registration after expiry of the statutory timeline. The authority was directed to consider the request in accordance with law within three weeks.
Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to withdraw the writ challenge against a Section 74 GST order and pursue the statutory appellate remedy instead. The Court directed the appellate authority to consider the appeal and delay condonation request in accordance with law.
