According to assessee, these claims were arbitrarily “zeroed out” in June 2018 without any speaking order or prior intimation, and without issuing a deficiency memo highlighting the alleged deficiencies in the claims.
CESTAT Kolkata held that payment received towards Licensing Fee from mobile towers cannot be considered as ‘rent’ to fall within the definition of ‘renting of immovable property’. Accordingly, service tax demand to that extent set aside.
The applicant sent the statutory demand notice to the accused on 23.05.2009 which was duly served but no payment was made. The applicant filed the criminal complaint before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate u/s. 138 of the NI Act, 1881.
NCLAT Delhi held that proposed sale in the form of private sale to related party being not in conformity with Regulation 33 of IBBI (Liquidation Regulations), 2016 hence order of Adjudication Authority allowing such private sale is liable to be set aside.
Kulveer Vs State of Himachal Pradesh (Himachal Pradesh High Court) Himachal Pradesh High Court held that applicant not ipso facto entitled for relief of bail merely on the ground that case is triable by the Court of Judicial Magistrate. Accordingly, bail application in money laundering matter dismissed. Facts- Applicant-Kulveer has filed the present application, under […]
Calcutta High Court held that period of offence prior to June 1, 2009 attracts Schedule to Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PMLA] being amended with effect from June 1, 2009 as proceeds of crime continue in possession till Amendment.
ITAT Agra held that where registration has been granted to trust under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act admissible to preceding years for which assessment proceedings were pending before AO.
Learn how to file your income tax return using AIS and Form 26AS with TaxBuddy’s DIY app. A step-by-step guide for accurate ITR filing in 2025.
Learn how pensioners can file income tax returns effortlessly using TaxBuddy’s DIY platform. Step-by-step instructions tailored for senior citizens in 2025.
Held that merely because of non-participation of the assessment proceedings, the valuable right of the petitioner would not be deprived of to prosecute a case under Section 264. Accordingly, orders passed u/s. 264 alongwith assessment orders u/s. 143 & 147 remanded back for fresh consideration.
