Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Patna Municipal Corporation Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Patna Municipal Corporation Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Kolkata)

CESTAT Kolkata held that payment received towards Licensing Fee from mobile towers cannot be considered as ‘rent’ to fall within the definition of ‘renting of immovable property’. Accordingly, service tax demand to that extent set aside.

Facts- The present appeal has been filed by M/s. Patna Municipal Corporation against the Order-in-Original dated 06.06.2014 wherein the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031